Google: Disavowing Random Links Flagged By Tools Is A Waste Of Time

Posted by

Google’s John Mueller responded to a concern about using the link disavow tool and used a tip about the best way to utilize it, particularly discussing links flagged by tools.

Although this tool was introduced ten years ago there is still much confusion regarding the proper use of it.

Link Disavow Tool

The link disavow tool was introduced by Google in October 2012.

The disavow tool followed in the wake of the Penguin Algorithm from Might 2012, which introduced a duration of unprecedented chaos in the search marketing neighborhood due to the fact that so many individuals were buying and selling links.

This period of openly purchasing and selling links pulled up on May 2012 when the Penguin algorithm update was released and thousands of websites lost rankings.

Making money links eliminated was a big discomfort for because they had to request removal from every site, one by one.

There were so many link elimination requests that some website owners began charging a cost to eliminate the links.

The SEO neighborhood asked Google for a much easier method to disavow links and in reaction to popular need Google released the Link Disavow tool on October 2012 for the express function of disavowing spam links that a site owner was responsible for.

The concept of a link disavow tool was something that had actually been subjugating for several years, a minimum of given that 2007.

Google resisted releasing that tool till after the Penguin upgrade.

Google’s main statement from October 2012 explained:

“If you have actually been informed of a manual spam action based upon “unnatural links” pointing to your website, this tool can assist you attend to the concern.

If you have not gotten this alert, this tool normally isn’t something you need to fret about.”

Google also offered details of what kinds of links might activate a manual action:

“We send you this message when we see evidence of paid links, link exchanges, or other link plans that breach our quality standards.”

John Mueller Advice on Link Disavow Tool

Mueller responded to a question about disavowing links to a domain residential or commercial property and as a side note used recommendations on the correct use of the tool.

The concern asked was:

“The disavow function in Browse Console is currently unavailable for domain residential or commercial properties. What are the choices then?”

John Mueller answered:

“Well, if you have domain level verification in place, you can confirm the prefix level without requiring any extra tokens.

Validate that host and do what you require to do.”

Then Mueller included an extra remark about the appropriate method to use the link disavow tool.

Mueller continued his response:

“Also, keep in mind that disavowing random links that look weird or that some tool has flagged, is not an excellent usage of your time.

It changes nothing.

Utilize the disavow tool for situations where you in fact spent for links and can’t get them eliminated later on.”

Hazardous Link Tools and Random Links

Numerous 3rd party tools utilize proprietary algorithms to score backlinks according to how spammy or toxic the tool business feels they are.

Those toxicity scores may accurately rank how bad particular links appear to be however they do not always associate with how Google ranks and utilizes links.

Harmful link tool scores are simply opinions.

The tools work for producing an automated backlink review, particularly when they highlight negative links that you thought were great.

Nevertheless, the only links one must be disavowing are the links one knows are paid for or are a part of a link scheme.

Should You Think Anecdotal Evidence of Toxic Hyperlinks?

Many individuals experience ranking losses and when inspecting their backlinks are surprised to find a big amount of incredibly poor quality websites linking to their websites.

Naturally it’s assumed that this is the factor for the ranking drops and a perpetual cycle of link disavowing commences.

In those cases it might work to think about that there is some other factor for the modification in rankings.

One case that sticks out is when somebody concerned me about a negative SEO attack. I took a look at the links and they were really bad, precisely as described.

There were numerous adult themed spam links with precise match anchor text on unrelated adult topics indicating his site.

Those backlinks fit the meaning of a negative SEO attack.

I was curious so I independently got in touch with a Googler by email.They emailed me back the next day and verified that unfavorable SEO was not the reason that the website had lost rankings.

The genuine cause for the loss of rankings was that the site was affected by the Panda algorithm.

What triggered the Panda algorithm was poor quality material that the website owner had created.

I have seen this many times ever since, where the real problem was that the website owner was unable to objectively review their own content so they blamed links.

It’s helpful to bear in mind that what seems like the apparent reason for a loss in rankings is not always the real reason, it’s just the simplest to blame due to the fact that it’s apparent.

But as John Mueller said, disavowing links that a tool has actually flagged which aren’t paid links is not a good use of time.


Featured image by Best SMM Panel/Asier Romero

Listen to the Google SEO Workplace Hours video at the 1:10 minute mark